知识产权保护的技术创新效应:量变抑或质变

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (6)

Download: PDF (1067 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract As an important institutional guarantee for technological innovation under the new development pattern of dual cycle,how the intellectual property protection (IPP)affects technological innovation,or how to view the technological innovation achievements under the IPP correctly is an important subject that needs to be discussed urgently to move towards the stage of high-quality development in China.To this end,from the perspective of quantity and quality,the paper specifically analyzes the impact of the IPP on technological innovation and proposes related theoretical hypotheses,and conducts relevant empirical tests based on provincial-level panel data from 2004 to 2017.The results show as follows.①Strengthening IPP can significantly increase the quantity of technological innovation;②Compared with the development of low-quality technological innovation,the continuous strengthening of IPP tends to develop high-quality technological innovation;③The promotion effect of IPP on high-quality technological innovation is particularly obvious in the eastern region.IPP in the central and western regions tends to promote low-quality technological innovation;④Within the different scales of technology transfer in the market,the impact of IPP on technological innovation has threshold effects,which vary across regions.Based on these results,this paper proposes some policy recommendations,including strengthening the protection of the source of intellectual property rights,expanding the scopes of IPP,rationally adjusting the level of regional IPP,and strengthening the protection of high-value patents.

Key words： Intellectual property protection Quantity of technological innovation Quality of innovation High-value patent

Received: 28 November 2020

PACS:

F270

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Gu Xiaoyan
	Xue Pingping
	Zhu Weiwei

Cite this article:

Gu Xiaoyan,Xue Pingping,Zhu Weiwei. The Effect of Intellectual Property Protection on Technological Innovation:Quantitative or Qualitative Change?[J]. , 2021, 2(10): 31-39.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I10/31

[1]陈战光,李广威,梁田,等.研发投入、知识产权保护与企业创新质量[J].科技进步与对策,2020 (5):108-117.
[2]SHAPIRO C.Navigating the patent thicket:cross licenses,patent pools,and standard-setting[R].Innovation policy and the economy,2001,1:119-150.
[3]邢斐,周泰云.研发补贴、知识产权保护与企业创新[J].中国科技论坛,2020 (9):114-124.
[4]吴超鹏,唐菂.知识产权保护执法力度、技术创新与企业绩效——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济研究,2016,51 (11):125-139.
[5]YANG G F.MASKUS E K.Intellectual property rights,licensing,and innovation in an endogenous product cycle mode[J].Journal of international economics,2001,53 (1):169-187.
[6]LEE B.KAMAL S.Intellectual property rights,foreign direct investment and industrial development[J].Economic Journal,2011,121 (555):1161-1191.
[7]孙玉红,马志鑫,盛莉.美国IP 政策的扩张策略与发展中国家知识产权保护——基于 “外压内应”机制的实证分析[J].国际贸易问题,2020 (4):51-68.
[8]刘思明,侯鹏,赵彦云.知识产权保护与中国工业创新能力——来自省级大中型工业企业面板数据的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2015,32 (3):40-57.
[9]张杰.中国专利增长之 “谜”——来自地方政府政策激励视角的微观经验证据[J].武汉大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2019 (1):85-103.
[10]DANG J,MOTOHASHI K.Patent statistics:a good indicator for innovation in China? Patent subsidy program impacts on patent quality[J].China economic review,2015,35 (3).137-155.
[11]金培振,殷德生,金桩.城市异质性、制度供给与创新质量[J].世界经济,2019 (11):99-123.
[12]蔡绍洪,俞立平.创新数量、创新质量与企业效益:来自高技术产业的实证[J].中国软科学,2017 (5):30-37.
[13]黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51 (4):60-73.
[14]杨俊,胡玮,张宗益.国内外R&D溢出与技术创新:对人力资本门槛的检验[J].中国软科学,2009 (4):31-41.
[15]刘凤朝,沈能.基于专利结构视角的中国区域创新能力差异研究[J].管理评论,2006,18 (11):44-47.
[16]关成华,袁祥飞,于晓龙.创新驱动、知识产权保护与区域经济发展——基于2007—2015年省级数据的门限面板回归[J].宏观经济研究,2018 (10):86-92.
[17]HANSEN B E.Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:estimation,testing,and inference[J].1999,93 (2):345-368.
[18]俞荣建,郑佳咪,项丽瑶,等.基于异质性研发合作的知识创造质量提升机制——内/外情境双重视角[J].科技管理研究,2020,40 (11):184-190.