企业科技向善:研究述评与展望

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (1225 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The research and practice of enterprise strategic management pay more and more attention to the phenomenon of technology for social good,but the research on its conceptual connotation and related categories is still in its infancy.Technology for social good refers to that enterprises take the initiative to develop and use responsible innovation to solve social problems on the premise of meeting their own needs for survival and development,and realize their commercial value creation and social value creation in the process of seeking the welfare and sustainable development of human society.On the basis of sorting out relevant concepts,this paper aims to put forward the definition of enterprise technology for social good.The characteristics and connotation are clarified,the theoretical foundations are explored,and the antecedents and consequences are discussed.Furthermore,the future research directions are summarized.This paper intends to facilitate understanding of enterprise technology for social good for future research in this field.

Key words： Enterprise technology for social good Concept Theoretical foundation Enterprise strategic management

Received: 15 October 2020

PACS:

F270

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Li Xinrong
	Mao Yijun
	Lei Jiasu

Cite this article:

Li Xinrong,Mao Yijun,Lei Jiasu. Enterprise Technology for Social Good:A Literature Review and Prospects[J]. , 2021, 2(7): 115-124.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I7/115

[1]PAZG N E.Ethical,legal,and social implications of nanotechnology [M]//BRAR S K,ZHANG T C,VERMA M,et al.Nanomaterials in the environment.Dallas:American Society of Civil Engineers.2015:553-561.
[2]BROWN M J.The source and status of values for socially responsible science [J].Philosophy studies,2012,163 (1):67-76.
[3]TSUI A S.The spirit of science and socially responsible scholarship [J].Management and organization review,2013,9 (3):375-394.
[4]HELLSTR M T.Systemic innovation and risk:technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation [J].Technology in society,2003,25 (3):369-384.
[5]OWEN R,BESSANT J R,HEINTZ M.Responsible innovation managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society [M].Chichester:John Wiley & Sons,2013.
[6]GEORGE G,HOWARD-GRENVILLE J,JOSHI A,et al.Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research [J].The academy of management journal,2016,59 (6):1880-1895.
[7]CHOPRA S K.Leveraging technological advances in corporate social responsibility (csr):a systems thinking approach [C]//Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference.Seattle,WA:IEEE,2012:122-127.
[8]孟猛猛,雷家骕.基于集体主义的企业科技向善:逻辑框架与竞争优势 [J].科技进步与对策,2021,38 (1):1-9.
[9]马克斯·韦伯,王容芬.伦理之业:马克斯·韦伯的两篇哲学演讲[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2012.
[10]樊春良,张新庆.论科学技术发展的伦理环境[J].科学学研究,2010,28 (11):1611-1618.
[11]薛桂波,闫坤如. “负责任创新”视角下技术伦理的政策转向 [J].大连理工大学学报 (社会科学版),2018,39 (1):9-14.
[12]VON SCHOMBERG R.From the ethics of technology towards an ethics of knowledge policy:implications for robotics [J].AI & Society,2007,22 (3):331-348.
[13]薛桂波,赵一秀.基于 “负责任创新”的欧盟科技政策转型及启示 [J].中国科技论坛,2017 (4):172-177.
[14]雷家骕.疫灾时期科技向善的创新 [J].网信军民融合,2020 (3):29-32.
[15]周以真.信息伪造是数字社会的巨大挑战 [M]//司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[16]威廉姆·科瓦契奇.强大的技术可能压倒选择 “向善”的能力 [M]//司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[17]饶培伦.科技以人类福祉为本 [M]//司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[18]金兼斌.科技向善,是社会真善美的题中之义 [M]//司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[19]陈春花.科技公司的最终使命是实现社会期望价值 [M]//司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[20]董洁林.不成为 “作恶工具”是科技公司的底线 [M]//司晓,马永武.科技向善:大科技时代的最优选.杭州:浙江大学出版社,2020.
[21]GRANT R M.Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm [J].Strategic management journal,1996,17 (S2):109-122.
[22]刘力钢.企业可持续发展模式研究 [J].辽宁大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2000 (3):12-15.
[23]BROWN L R.Building a sustainable society [M].New York:Norton,1981.
[24]STILGOE J,OWEN R,MACNAGHTEN P.Developing a framework for responsible innovation [J].Research policy,2013,42 (9):1568-1580.
[25]CLARKSON M E.A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance [J].The academy of management review,1995,20 (1):92-117.
[26]CARROLL A B.A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance [J].The academy of management review,1979,4 (4):497-505.
[27]PORTER M E,KRAMER M R.Strategy and society:the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility [J].Harvard business review,2006,84 (12):78-92.
[28]SUCHMAN M C.Managing legitimacy:strategic and institutional approaches [J].The academy of management review,1995,20 (3):571-610.
[29]WILLIAMS C A,HEINS R M.Risk management and insurance [M].New York:McGraw-Hill,1985.
[30]曹元坤,王光俊.企业风险管理发展历程及其研究趋势的新认识 [J].当代财经,2011 (1):85-92.
[31]朱葆伟.科学技术伦理:公正和责任 [J].哲学动态,2000 (10):9-11.
[32]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集 [M].第3版.北京:人民出版社,2012.
[33]周家荣,廉勇杰.从工具理性到价值理性:科技与社会关系的重大调整——兼论科技在构建和谐社会中的功能整合 [J].科学管理研究,2007 (5):35-38.
[34]BARNEY J.Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage [J].Journal of management,1991,17 (1):99-120.
[35]PRAHALAD C K,HAMEL G.The core competence of the corporation [J].Harvard business review,1990,68 (3):79-91.
[36]DAVID J T,GARY P,AMY S.Dynamic capabilities and strategic management [J].Strategic management journal,1997,18 (7):509-533.
[37]MEYER J W,ROWAN B.Institutionalized organizations:formal structure as myth and ceremony [J].The american journal of sociology,1977,83 (2):340-363.
[38]DIMAGGIO P J,POWELL W W.The iron cage revisited:institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields [J].American sociological review,1983,48 (2):147-160.
[39]FREEMAN R E.Strategic management:a stakholder approach [J].Journal of management studies,1984,29 (2):131-154.
[40]HAMBRICK D C,MASON P A.Upper echelons:the organization as a reflection of its top managers [J].The academy of management review,1984,9 (2):193-206.
[41]FOMBRUN C,SHANLEY M.What's in a name? reputation building and corporate strategy [J].Academy of management journal,1990,33 (2):233-258.
[42]CAMPBELL J L.Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility [J].The academy of management review,2007,32 (3):946-967.
[43]周中胜,何德旭,李正.制度环境与企业社会责任履行:来自中国上市公司的经验证据 [J].中国软科学,2012 (10):59-68.
[44]FIOL C M,LYLES M A.Organizational learning [J].The academy of management review,1985,10 (4):803-813.
[45]SANJAY S,HARRIE V.Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities [J].Strategic management journal,1998,19 (8):729-753.
[46]BUYSSE K,VERBEKE A.Proactive environmental strategies:a stakeholder management perspective [J].Strategic management journal,2003,24 (5):453-470.
[47]HAFSI T,TURGUT G.Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance:conceptualization and empirical evidence [J].Journal of business ethics,2012,112 (3):463-479.
[48]LIAO L,LUO L,TANG Q.Gender diversity,board independence,environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure [J].The british accounting review,2015,47 (4):409-424.
[49]CRISOSTOMO V L,OLIVEIRA M R.An analysis of the determinants of corporate social responsibility of brazilian firms [J].Brazilian business review,2016,13 (4):72-93.
[50]姜丽群.企业社会失责行为的动因、影响及其治理研究 [J].管理世界,2016 (3):174-175.
[51]PRATIMA B,TREVOR H.Strategic explanations for the early adoption of ISO 14001 [J].Journal of business ethics,2003,46 (3):289-299.
[52]WEAVER G R,TREVINO L K,COCHRAN P L.Corporate ethics programs as control systems:influences of executive commitment and environmental factors [J].Academy of management journal,1999,42 (1):41-57.
[53]AMIT R,ZOTT C.Value creation in E-business [J].Strategic management journal,2001,22 (6/7):493-520.
[54]PORTER M E,VAN DER LINDE C.Green and competitive:ending the stalemate [J].Harvard business review,1995,73 (5):120-137.
[55]WADDOCK S A,GRAVES S B.The corporate social performance-financial performance link [J].Strategic management journal,1997,18 (4):303-319.