产业结构变迁对城市经济高质量发展的影响研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (960 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Under the background of the new normal,high-quality economic development will replace economic growth as the theme of China's economy.This paper constructs an index system of high-quality development of Chinese urban economy from five aspects:innovation,coordination,green,openness and sharing.Based on the data of 281 cities in China from 2004 to 2018,the entropy-weighted TOPSIS method is used to measure the dimensions and comprehensive indicators of the level of high-quality urban economic development.Meanwhile,the SARAR model is used to analyze the impact of industrial structure on high-quality urban economic development.The study found that the open dimension and the sharing dimension contribute greatly to the urban economic high-quality development level in the urban economic high-quality development level,and the urban economic high-quality development level and its various dimensions are in the fluctuating rise;there is a significant structural dividend in the process of high-quality development of urban economy,that is,there is a significant U-shaped relationship between the upgrading of industrial structure and the high-quality development level of urban economy;there is a dynamic equilibrium effect in the improvement of high-quality development level of urban economy,that is,the improvement of industrial structure rationalization level will promote the improvement of high quality development level of urban economy;the advanced and rationalized industrial structure have a relatively large impact on the green and open dimensions of urban economic high-quality development.Through the measurement of China's urban economic high-quality development level and its various dimensions,as well as the research of industrial structure on the urban economic high-quality development,it provides a policy reference for promoting the development of Chinese urban economic high-quality development and the transformation of industrial structure.

Key words： High-quality development Urban economy Measurement system Industrial structure

Received: 23 September 2020

PACS:

F062.9

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Sun Xuetao

Cite this article:

Sun Xuetao. Study on the Influence of Industrial Structure Change on the High-Quality Development of Urban Economy[J]. , 2021, 2(7): 86-96.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I7/86

[1]任保平.中国经济高质量发展三维动力体系的系统再造研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2020 (3):5-10.
[2]蒲晓晔,FIDRMUC J.中国经济高质量发展的动力结构优化机理研究[J].西北大学学报 (哲学社会科学版),2018,48 (1):113-118.
[3]陈诗一,陈登科.雾霾污染、政府治理与经济高质量发展[J].经济研究,2018,53 (2):20-34.
[4]康梅.投资增长模式下经济增长因素分解与经济增长质量[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006 (2):153-160.
[5]陈诗一.能源消耗、二氧化碳排放与中国工业的可持续发展[J].经济研究,2009,44 (4):41-55.
[6]CHOW G C,LI K W.China's economic growth:1952-2010[J].Economic development & cultural change,2002,51 (1):247-256.
[7]王振华,李萌萌,江金启.交通可达性对城市经济高质量发展的异质性影响[J].经济与管理研究,2020,41 (2):98-111.
[8]BARRO R J.Quantity and quality of economic growth[J].Working papers central bank of chile,2002,5 (2):17-36.
[9]钞小静,任保平.中国经济增长质量的时序变化与地区差异分析[J].经济研究,2011,46 (4):26-40.
[10]付晨玉,杨艳琳.中国工业化进程中的产业发展质量测度与评价[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2020,37 (3):3-25.
[11]詹新宇,崔培培.中国省际经济增长质量的测度与评价——基于 “五大发展理念”的实证分析[J].财政研究,2016 (8):40-53+39.
[12]PENEDER M.Industrial structure and aggregate growth[J].Structural change & economic dynamics,2003,14 (4):427-448.
[13]孙学涛,张广胜.技术进步偏向对城市经济高质量发展的影响——基于结构红利的视角[J].管理学刊,2020,33 (6):36-47.
[14]干春晖,郑若谷,余典范.中国产业结构变迁对经济增长和波动的影响[J].经济研究,2011,46 (5):4-16+31.
[15]崔敏,赵增耀.服务业内部结构异质性与高质量发展路径——基于全要素生产率视角[J].山西财经大学学报,2020,42 (6):73-86.
[16]徐艳飞,刘再起.对外贸易、劳动力转移与全要素生产率增长[J].云南财经大学学报,2015,31 (1):74-82.
[17]胡静波,刘雅娇.金融业发展对宏观经济增长的影响研究——基于高素质劳动力持续转移的视角[J].经济与管理评论,2019,35 (4):64-74.
[18]BOSWORTH B,COLLINS S M.Accounting for growth:comparing China and India[J].Journal of economic perspectives,2008,22 (1):45-66.
[19]张红霞,王悦.经济制度变迁、产业结构演变与中国经济高质量发展[J].经济体制改革,2020 (2):31-37.
[20]李小平,陈勇.劳动力流动、资本转移和生产率增长——对中国工业 “结构红利假说”的实证检验[J].统计研究,2007, (7):22-28.
[21]EICHENGREEN B.The two waves of service-sector growth[M].Oxford:Oxford economic papers,2012,65 (235):96-123.
[22]李子联.中国收入分配格局:从结构失衡到合理有序[J].中南财经政法大学学报,2015 (3):34-41+159.
[23]TIMMER M V,SZIRMAI A.Productivity growth in Asian manufacturing:the structural bonus hypothesis examined[J].Structural change and economic dynamics,2000, (4):371-392.
[24]PARTEKA A.Economic growth,structural change and quality upgrading in new member states[J].Departmental working papers,2009, (20):9-27.
[25]韩永辉,黄亮雄,王贤彬.产业结构优化升级改进生态效率了吗[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2016,33 (4):40-59.
[26]FAGERBERG J.Technological progress,structural change and productivity growth:a comparative study[J].Structural change and economic dynamics,2000,11 (4):393-411.
[27]金碚.关于 “高质量发展”的经济学研究[J].中国工业经济,2018 (4):5-18.
[28]刘思明,张世瑾,朱惠东.国家创新驱动力测度及其经济高质量发展效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2019,36 (4):3-23.
[29]魏敏,李书昊.新时代中国经济高质量发展水平的测度研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2018,35 (11):3-20.
[30]潘文卿.中国的区域关联与经济增长的空间溢出效应[J].经济研究,2012,47 (1):54-65.
[31]胡亚茹,陈丹丹.中国高技术产业的全要素生产率增长率分解——兼对 “结构红利假说”再检验[J].中国工业经济,2019 (2):136-154.
[32]刘华军,雷名雨.中国结构红利的空间格局及其大国雁阵模式[J].中国软科学,2019 (3):86-102.
[33]曾起艳,曾寅初,王振华.全要素生产率提升中 “结构红利假说”的非线性检验——基于285个城市面板数据的双门限回归分析[J].经济与管理研究,2018,39 (9):29-40.
[34]匡远配,陆钰凤.我国农地流转 “内卷化”陷阱及其出路[J].农业经济问题,2018 (9):33-43.
[35]钟章奇,何凌云.演化经济视角下技术创新扩散驱动的区域产业结构演化:一个新的理论分析框架[J].经济问题探索,2020 (4):161-172.