基于治理转型背景下社会资本对科技社团治理有效性的影响研究

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (10)

Download: PDF (1030 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract It is an important value orientation to promote the modernization of social organization governance ability under the background of Chinese governance transformation.Based on this,this paper refines the research object,and takes 191 national first-class science and technology communities which are attached to China Association for Science and Technology as samples to analyze the influence of social capital on the governance effectiveness of science and technology communities.Here are the main conclusions:good structural social capital can effectively help science and technology communities achieve the governance goals,and it is embodied in three aspects including network scale,network composition and network quality;Weakening administrative intervention and promoting specialization level of science and technology communities can further stimulate and moderate this positive role.The relevant research not only enriches the governance theory of science and technology communities,but also provides new ideas for improving the governance effectiveness of science and technology communities and solving the practical problems in the process of governance transformation.

Key words： Science and technology community Social capital Governance effectiveness

Received: 11 June 2020

PACS:

G301

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Lu Yunpeng

Cite this article:

Lu Yunpeng. Research on the Influence of Social Capital on the Governance Effectiveness of Science and Technology Communities Under the Background of Governance Transformation[J]. , 2021, 2(4): 150-160.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I4/150

[1]王春法.关于科技社团在国家创新体系中地位和作用的几点思考[J].科学学研究,2012,30 (10):1445-1448.
[2]DELICADO A,RAQUEL R,CONCEICAO C P,et al.What roles for scientific associations in contemporary science[J].Minerva,2014,52 (4):439-465.
[3]鲁云鹏,李晓琳.国家科学院治理理论研究——基于默顿科学社会学的视角[J].科技管理研究,2019,39 (21):259-266.
[4]陈成文,黄开腾.制度环境与社会组织发展:国外经验及其政策借鉴意义[J].探索,2018,34 (1):144-152.
[5]石碧涛,张捷.社会资本与行业协会的治理绩效分析——以广东东莞行业协会为例[J].经济管理,2011,33 (5):165-174.
[6]问延安,徐济益.社会信任和组织激励非营组织诚信治理的路径选择[J].长春工业大学学报,2010,31 (2):44-47.
[7]时影,罗亮.网络公共空间的有效治理:目标、主体与手段[J].中共天津市委党校学报,2016,23 (6):78-84.
[8]鲁云鹏.科技社团治理:内涵、问题与实现[J].中国科技论坛,2019,35 (11):1-9.
[9]MITCHELL G E.The construct of organizational effectiveness:perspectives from leaders of international nonprofits in the United States[J].Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly,2013,42 (2):322-343.
[10]JEANNE B.Science communication at scientific societies[J].Seminars in cell & developmental biology,2017,70 (2):85-89.
[11]SCHNEIDER J A.Organizational social capital and nonprofits[J].Nonprofit and voluntary sector quarterly,2009,38 (4):643-662.
[12]周进国,周爱光.体育社团结构型社会资本的培育研究[J].武汉体育学院学报,2018,60 (2):16-20.
[13]GUISO L,SAPIENZA P,ZINGALES L.Civic capital as the missing link[J].Handbook of social economics,2011,1 (1):417-480.
[14]PUTNAM R.Making democracy work:civic traditions in modern Italy[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1993.
[15]UPHOFF N,WIJAYARATNA C M.Demonstrated benefits from social capital:the productivity of farmer organizations in Gal Oya,SriLanka[J].World development,2000,28 (11):1875-1890.
[16]刘婷,李瑶.社会资本对渠道关系绩效影响的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34 (2):95-102.
[17]李文钊,蔡长昆.政治制度结构、社会资本与公共治理制度选择[J].管理世界,2012,28 (8):43-54.
[18]尹广文.从行政化控制到体制性吸纳:改革开放以来中国社会组织治理问题研究[J].南京政治学院学报,2016,30 (2):53-60.
[19]刘延东. “社会资本”理论述评[J].国外社会科学,1998,21 (3):18-21.
[20]康丽群,刘汉民.企业社会资本参与公司治理的机制与效能:理论分析与实证检验[J].南开管理评论,2015,24 (4):72-81.
[21]BURT R S.The network structure of social capital[J].Research in organizational behavior.2000,22 (1):345-423.
[22]COREY C P.A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J].Academy of management journal,2010,53 (4):890-913.
[23]常红锦,仵永恒.网络异质性、网络密度与企业创新绩效——基于知识资源视角[J].财经论丛,2013,26 (6):83-88.
[24]许鹿,孙畅,王诗宗.政治关联对社会组织绩效的影响研究——基于专业化水平的调节效应[J].行政论坛,2018,25 (4):128-133.
[25]唐松,孙峥.政治关联、高管薪酬与企业未来经营绩效[J].管理世界,2014,30 (5):93-105.
[26]南开大学公司治理研究中心公司治理评价课题组.中国上市公司治理指数与治理绩效的实证分析[J].管理世界,2004,20 (2):63-74.
[27]赵立新.科技社团绩效评价四维框架模型研究[J].科研管理,2011,32 (12):151-156.
[28]吴迪,邓国胜.基于使命和宗旨视角的科技社团能力要素模型构建[J].中国非营利评论,2018,12 (2):174-179.
[29]郗永勤.学会秘书长职业标准研究[J].学会,2009,25 (1):3-8.
[30]隗斌贤,俞学慧,顾继红.对新形势下科技社团秘书处工作与秘书长角色定位的新思考[J].学会,2014,30 (4):34-38.
[31]陈建国.政社关系与科技社团承接职能的转移——基于调查问卷的实证分析[J].中国行政管理,2015,22 (5):38-45.
[32]费梅苹.政府购买社会工作服务中的基层政社关系研究[J].社会科学,2014,36 (6):74-83.
[33]唐国平,李龙会,吴德军.环境管制、行业属性与环保投资[J].会计研究,2013,34 (6):83-89.