|
|
Construction and Demonstration of Evaluation Index System of Urban Innovation and Entrepreneurship Environment ——Take 17 Cities in Shandong Province as an Example |
Gao Bin1,2, Duan Xinxing1 |
1. School of Public Administration,China University of Mining and Technology,Xuzhou 221116,China; 2. School of Business Administration,Shandong Women's University,Jinan 250002,China |
|
|
Abstract Based on the PSR model and its elements combination,this paper constructs the evaluation index system of urban innovation and entrepreneurship environment.The innovation and entrepreneurship environment of 17 cities in Shandong province was evaluated by factor analysis and classified by cluster analysis.The results of the two kinds of analysis are consistent,the innovation and entrepreneurship environment scores of Jinan,Qingdao,Zibo,Yantai,Weifang are above the average level,and scores of other cities are all below the average level,Qingdao and Jinan scored well above the other 15 cities in the overall assessment of the environment for innovation and entrepreneurship.The environment for innovation and entrepreneurship in 17 cities of Shandong province is divided into three levels.Qingdao and Jinan are in the leading position.Yantai,Weifang,Dezhou,Liaocheng,Heze,Jining,Linyi are in the challenging position,Dongying,Weihai,Laiwu,Zaozhuang,Binzhou,Tai'an,Rizhao and Zibo are in the improvement stage.This study provides theoretical basis and decision-making reference for the optimization of urban innovation and entrepreneurship environment,and has important guiding significance for the optimization of urban innovation and entrepreneurship environment.
|
Received: 16 July 2020
|
|
|
|
|
[1]DAVID J R,TONY F.Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental statistics:a stress-response approach[M].Ottawa:Statistics Canada,1979. [2]GNYAWALI D R,FOGEL D S.Environments for entrepreneurship development:key dimensions and research implications[J].Entrepreneurship theory & practice,1994,18(4):43-62. [3]姜彦福.全球创业观察2002中国报告[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2013. [4]LOSIS A S.Entrepreneurship policy:theory and practice[M].New York:Springer US,2005. [5]谢小青,黄晶晶.基于PSR模型的城市创业环境评价分析——以武汉市为例[J].中国软科学,2017(2):172-182. [6]陈楠,杜磊.以家庭农场为载体的农民创业环境评价[J].西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版),2018(1):50-57. [7]魏瑞.基于PSR模型的我国城市创业环境评价——以4个直辖市为例[J].工业技术经济,2018,37(6):94-101. [8]张帆.中美大学生创业环境的比较分析[J].科学管理研究,2010(1):112-115. [9]周永华,安剑.我国各省(市、区)创业环境评价分析[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(15):226-230. [10]陈章旺,柯玉珍.“互联网+”背景下两岸创新创业环境比较——以闽台两省为例[J].科技管理研究,2018,38(21):35-40. [11]郭晓丹.基于GEM模型框架的辽宁省创业环境解析与评价[J].财经问题研究,2009(11):24-31. [12]朱琳.基于GEM框架下的银川市创业环境研究[J].宁夏社会科学,2014(3):44-53. [13]张秀娥,王超.创新驱动下我国创业生态环境优化研究——基于GEM数据分析[J].经济问题探索,2018(5):45-52. [14]刘新民,宋红汝,范柳.区域创业环境与创新平台对创业企业的吸引力研究[J].科技管理研究,2019,39(7):7-13. [15]林嵩.创业生态系统:概念发展与运行机制[J].中央财经大学学报,2011(4):58-62. [16]高冉晖,张玉赋.江苏科技人才创新创业生态环境研究——基于调查问卷的分析[J].特区经济,2015(5):42-44. [17]黄荔梅.优化创新创业生态环境[J].社科纵横,2016,31(11):63-65. [18]鄂义强,刘晓莉.供给侧结构性改革视域下构建大学生创业生态环境的策略思考[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2018(1):183-188. |
|
|
|