校长海外经历能否提升高校创新水平

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (6886 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Based on upper echelons theory,this paper manually collects oversea experience data of presidents in universities affiliated by ministry of education,and investigates the relationship between president's oversea experience and university innovation activities.We find that president's oversea experience and the length of president's oversea experience promote university innovations.Compared to single-country or single-category oversea experience,president's multiple-country or multiple-category oversea experience significantly increase the level of university innovations.Meanwhile,the effect of president's oversea experience on university innovations is more pronounced when president did not work in current university,president has previous working experience of other institutions,president has political connections or university is located in regions of high marketization.Overall,this research expands the existing literature of determinants of organizational innovation and of economic consequences of managerial oversea experience.By providing empirical evidence,this paper is beneficial for the evaluation of implementation effects of oversea brain gain policies,the recruitments and the heterogeneous effect of university presidents with oversea experience.

Key words： President's oversea experience Level of university innovation Upper echelons theory Managerial characteristic

Received: 01 June 2020

PACS:

F204

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Zhang Yuyang
	Dong Liping
	He Ying
	Fu Sibao

Cite this article:

Zhang Yuyang,Dong Liping,He Ying, et al. Can President's Oversea Experience Promote the Level of University Innovations[J]. , 2021, 2(2): 121-131.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2021/V2/I2/121

[1]焦翠红,孙海波,董直庆.R&D资源配置效率演化及研发补贴效应——来自制造业的经验证据[J].山西财经大学学报,2017,39 (2):58-71.
[2]王晓珍,蒋子浩,郑颖.我国高校创新效率评价研究:八大区域视角[J].科研管理,2019,40 (3):114-125.
[3]沈能,宫为天.我国省区高校科技创新效率评价实证分析——基于三阶段DEA模型[J].科研管理,2013,34 (S1):125-132.
[4]张惠琴,尚甜甜.高校科研创新效率对比分析——基于全国30个省份的面板数据[J].科研管理,2015,36 (S1):181-186.
[5]于志军,杨昌辉,白羽,等.成果类型视角下高校创新效率及影响因素研究[J].科研管理,2017,38 (5):141-149.
[6]苑泽明,张永贝,宁金辉.京津冀高校科研创新绩效评价——基于DEA-BCC和DEA-Malmquist模型[J].财会月刊,2018 (24):26-32.
[7]周泽将,李艳萍,胡琴.海归高管与企业创新投入:高管持股的调节作用——基于创业板企业的实证研究[J].北京社会科学,2014 (3):41-51.
[8]张信东,吴静.海归高管能促进企业技术创新吗[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (1):115-128.
[9]GIANNETTI M,LIAO G,YU X.The brain gain of corporate boards:evidence from China[J].Journal of finance,2015,70 (4):1629-1682.
[10]柳光强,孔高文.高管海外经历是否提升了薪酬差距[J].管理世界,2018,34 (8):130-142.
[11]宋建波,文雯,王德宏.海归高管能促进企业风险承担吗——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].财贸经济,2017,38 (12):111-126.
[12]郑明波.高管海外经历、专业背景与企业技术创新[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (10):137-144.
[13]刘青,张超,吕若思,等. “海归”创业经营业绩是否更优:来自中国民营企业的证据[J].世界经济,2013,36 (12):70-89.
[14]杜勇,张欢,陈建英.CEO海外经历与企业盈余管理[J].会计研究,2018 (2):27-33.
[15]PENG M,ZHOU J.How network strategies and institutional transitions evolve in Asia[J].Asia pacific journal of management,2005,22 (4):321-336.
[16]ZWEIG D.Competing for talent:China's strategies to reverse the brain drain[J].International labor review,2006,145 (1-2):65-89.
[17]魏立才.海外青年理工科人才回国流向及其影响因素研究[J].高等教育研究,2019,40 (6):25-33.
[18]HAMBRICK D C,MASON P A.Upper echelons:the organization as a reflection of its top managers[J].Academy of management review,1984,9 (2):193-206.
[19]熊艾伦,蒲勇健,王睿.女性高管对企业创新决策的影响[J].管理工程学报,2019,33 (1):30-36.
[20]李井林,阳镇.董事会性别多元化、企业社会责任与企业技术创新——基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40 (5):34-51.
[21]KUNZE F,MENGES J I.Younger supervisors,older subordinates:an organizational-level study of age differences,emotions,and performance[J].Journal of organizational behavior,2017,38 (4):461-486.
[22]艾永芳.上下级逆向年龄关系对企业创新的影响[J].当代财经,2019 (11):82-94.
[23]张兆国,曹丹婷,向首任.制度背景、董事长任期与企业技术创新绩效[J].中国软科学,2017 (10):114-127.
[24]马永强,邱煜,金智.CEO贫困出身与企业创新:人穷志短抑或穷则思变[J].经济管理,2019,41 (12):88-104.
[25]权小锋,醋卫华,尹洪英.高管从军经历、管理风格与公司创新[J].南开管理评论,2019,22 (6):140-151.
[26]张晓亮,杨海龙,唐小飞.CEO学术经历与企业创新[J].科研管理,2019,40 (2):154-163.
[27]赵子夜,杨庆,陈坚波.通才还是专才:CEO的能力结构和公司创新[J].管理世界,2018,34 (2):123-143.
[28]何瑛,于文蕾,戴逸驰,等.高管职业经历与企业创新[J].管理世界,2019,35 (11):174-192.
[29]权小锋,徐星美,蔡卫华.高管从军经历影响审计费用吗?——基于组织文化的新视角[J].审计研究,2018 (2):80-86.
[30]YUAN R,WEN W.Managerial foreign experience and corporate innovation[J].Journal of corporate finance,2018,48 (1):752-770.
[31]王辉耀,路江涌.中国海归创业发展报告2012 [M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2012.
[32]姜启波,谭清美.企业创新绩效组态路径研究——基于模糊定性分析法[J].中国科技论坛,2019 (8):67-76.
[33]刘凤朝,默佳鑫,马荣康.高管团队海外背景对企业创新绩效的影响研究[J].管理评论,2017,29 (7):135-147.
[34]WERNERFELT B.A resource-based view of the firm[J].Strategic management journal,1984,5 (2):171-180.
[35]DAHL M S,PEDERSEN C O.Social networks in the R&D process:the case of the wireless communication industry around Aalborg,Denmark[J].Journal of engineering and technology management,2005,22 (1-2):75-92.
[36]LEE H U,PARK J H.Top team diversity,internationalization and the mediating effect of international alliances[J].British journal of management,2006,17 (3):195-213.
[37]CONYON M J,HAß L H,VERGAUWE S,et al.Foreign experience and CEO compensation[J].Journal of corporate finance,2019,57 (4):102-121.
[38]王小鲁,樊纲,余静文.中国分省份市场化指数报告 (2016)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.
[39]刘畅,陈守明.校长任期对一流大学绩效的影响——基于1999—2018年面板数据的实证研究[J].科研管理,2019,40 (5):275-281.
[40]LENNOX C S,FRANCIS J R,WANG Z.Selection models in accounting research[J].Accounting review,2012,87 (2):589-616.
[41]QIAN C,CAO Q,TAKEUCHI R.Top management team functional diversity and organizational innovation in China:the moderating effects of environment[J].Strategic management journal,2013,34 (1):110-120.
[42]FRANCIS B,HASAN I,WU Q.Professors in the boardroom and their impact on corporate governance and firm performance[J].Financial management,2015,44 (3):547-581.