|
|
|
| What Kind of Jobs are More Easily Replaced By Artificial Intelligence |
| Zhou Wen, Geng Yuan |
| School of Labor Economics,Capital University of Economics and Business,Beijing 100070,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract What kind of work is more easily replaced by artificial intelligence is a question that has attracted much attention during the development of artificial intelligence.Because different positions have different job requirements and industry characteristics,there are also differences in the ease of replacement by artificial intelligence technology.In general,simple and repetitive programmatic work has lower replacement costs and is easier to be replaced;High-value-added industries have higher replacement benefits and are easier to be replaced.The article summarizes the types of jobs that will and will not be replaced by artificial intelligence,and the characteristics of these jobs.From the perspective of the replacement process of artificial intelligence for different positions,the speed and scale of artificial intelligence replacing traditional positions ultimately depend on the development speed of artificial intelligence itself,the increase of labor costs,and the degree to which artificial intelligence can improve the benefits of different positions.In addition,artificial intelligence will intensify the polarization of the future labor market in the process of replacing traditional jobs.
|
|
Received: 17 February 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] FREY C B,OSBORNE M A.The future of employment:How susceptible are jobs to computerization[J].Technological forecasting and social change,2017,114(17):254-280.
[2] DAVID B.Computer technology and probable job destructions in Japan:an evaluation[J].Journal of the Japanese and international economies,2017,43(3):77-87.
[3] 钟义信.人工智能:概念·方法·机遇[J].科学通报,2017(22):2473-2479.
[4] RUSSELL S J,PETER N.Artificial Intelligence:a modern approach prentice hall[J].Applied mechanics & materials,2010,263(45):2829-2833.
[5] 刘克松,程广明,李尧.人工智能概念内涵与外延研究[J].中国新通信,2018,20(14):145-146.
[6] 朱敏,纪雯雯,高春雷,等.人工智能与劳动力市场变革:机遇和挑战[J].教育经济评论,2018(2):23-35.
[7] 赵尔罡.电子商务与人工智能技术的整合研究[J].中国科技信息,2017(23):119-120.
[8] 杨伟国,邱子童,吴清军.人工智能应用的就业效应研究综述[J].中国人口科学,2018(5):111-121.
[9] ACEMOGLU D,RESTREPO P.Robots and jobs:evidence from US labor markets[J].Social science electronic publishing,2017,17(3):95-185.
[10] ARNTZ M,GREGORY T,ZIERAHN U.The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries:a comparative analysis[R].OECD Social,Employment and Migration Working Papers,No.189,2016.
[11] AUTOR D H.Why are there still so many jobs?The history and future of workplace automation[J].Journal of economic perspectives,2015,29(3):3-30.
[12] AUTOR D H,DORN D.The growth of low skill service jobs and the polarization of the U.S.labor market[J].NBER Working Papers,2009.
[13] 钟仁耀,刘苇,刘晓雪,等.科技进步对上海就业影响的实证分析——基于分行业的视角[J].人口与经济,2013(2):78-85.
[14] TRAJTENBERG M.AI as the next GPT:a political-economy perspective[J].CEPR discussion papers,2018.
[15] DAVID H,AUTOR D H.The“task approach”to labor markets:an overview[J].Journal for labour market research,2013,46(3):185-199.
[16] 吴清军,陈轩,王非,等.人工智能是否会带来大规模失业?——基于电商平台人工智能技术、经济效益与就业的测算[J].山东社会科学,2019(3):75-82.
[17] 李开复,王咏刚.人工智能[M].北京:文化出版社,2017.
[18] 王君,张于喆,张义博,等.人工智能等新技术进步影响就业的机理与对策[J].宏观经济研究,2017(10):169-181.
[19] GOOS M,MANNING A.Lousy and lovely jobs:the rising polarization of work in Britain[J].Review of economics and statistics,2007,89(1):118-133.
[20] MICHAELS G,NATRAJ A,VAN REENEN J.Has ICT polarized skill demand? Evidence from eleven countries over 25 years[J].CEPR discussion papers,2010,96(1):60-77.
[21] 杨虎涛.人工智能、奇点时代与中国机遇[J].财经问题研究,2018(10):12-20.
[22] 赵磊,赵晓磊.AI正在危及人类的就业机会吗[J].社会科学文摘,2018(1):60-62.
[23] 蔡啸,黄旭美.人工智能技术会抑制制造业就业吗?——理论推演与实证检验[J].商业研究,2019(6):53-62.
[24] 吕荣杰,郝力晓.人工智能等技术对劳动力市场的影响效应研究[J].工业技术经济,2018(12):133-139. |
|
|
|
2020, Vol. 1 
