国家财政资助项目科技成果权属的历史沿革、制度障碍和解决方案

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5796 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract The two-right model “the ownership of the scientific and technological achievements and intellectual property rights' which established by the Scientific and Technological Progress Law is the basic institutional framework for China to establish the ownership of scientific and technological achivements in state-funded projects,and it is the summary of the experience of the localized development of China's S&T innovation policy.It experienced four stages.The two-right model has played a certain role in promoting the transformation of scientific and technological achievements.However,from the perspective of institutional system,the unclear legal content of ownership of scientific and technological achievements and the unclear relationship between the two rights have caused the incongruity between Science and Technology Law and Intellectual Property Law,which is likely to lead to understand chaos and expectation failure.In the future,within the framework of Intellectual Property Law,China's legislation should amend article 20 paragraph 1 of the Scientific and Technological Progress Law and improve the legal person property of scientific and technological achievements to adjust the ownership system of scientific and technological achievements and realize the integration of scientific and technological policies.

Key words： Scientific and technological achievement Ownership Intellectual property

Received: 24 February 2020

PACS:

DF523

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Ma Bo
	He Yingchun

Cite this article:

Ma Bo,He Yingchun. The Historical Evolution,Institutional Obstacles and Solutions of the Ownership of Scientific and Technological Achievements of State-Funded Projects[J]. , 2020, 1(11): 48-55.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I11/48

[1] 方炜,郑立明,王莉丽.改革开放40年:中国技术转移体系建设之路[J].中国科技论坛,2019(4):17-27.
[2] 何炼红,陈吉灿.中国版“拜杜法案”的失灵与高校知识产权转化的出路[J].知识产权,2013(3):84-89.
[3] 专利法(修正案草案)征求意见[EB/OL].(2019-01-04)[2019-01-15].https://www.lawxp.com/statute/s1831652.html.
[4] 张希坡.革命根据地的科技政策与法规[J].法学杂志,1988(2):38-40.
[5] 黄坤益.关于《中华人民共和国专利法(草案)》的说明[EB/OL].(1983-12-02)[2019-01-06].http://www.npc.gov.cn/wxzl/gongbao/2000-12/26/content_5001493.htm.
[6] 陈甬军.中国为什么在50年代选择了计划经济体制[J].中国经济史研究,2004(3):48-55.
[7] 唐允斌.应当研究技术引进中的经济问题[J].世界经济,1978(1):69-71.
[8] 轻工业科技成果有偿转让试行办法[EB/OL].(1981-10-08)[2019-01-06].http://www.chinalawedu.com/falvfagui/fg22598/22044.shtml.
[9] 拉索欣 B Π.发展科学技术统一政策的法律机制[J].国外法学,1981(2):53-56.
[10] 中共中央关于科学技术体制改革的决定[EB/OL].(1985-03-13)[2019-01-18].http://www.chinalawedu.com/falvfagui/fg22598/5344.shtml.
[11] 胡朝阳.科技进步法第20条和第21条的立法比较与完善[J].科学学研究,2011,29(3):327-332.
[12] 王以铭.全国人大法律委员会关于《中华人民共和国科学技术进步法(修订草案)》审议结果的报告[DB/OL].(2007-12-23)[2019-01-9].http://vpnlib.imu.edu.cn/rwt/107/http/P75YPLURNN4XZZLYF3SXP/fulltext_form.aspx?Db=protocol&Gid=f6cc0486af30c18b9c924d65f50acfbdbdfb&keyword=%E8%BF%9B%E6%AD%A5%E6%B3%95&EncodingNam-
e=&Search_Mode=accurate&Search_IsTitle=0.
[13] 肖尤丹.开放创新与知识产权制度研究[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2017:15.
[14] 李金惠,林映华.关于财政资助项目科技成果权属若干基本概念的探讨[J].科技与创新,2017(14):6-9.
[15] 李金惠,林映华.广东省级财政资金科技成果权属制度改革分析[J].科技管理研究,2017(13):52-56.
[16] 吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(十四):科研人员科技成果所有权探析[J].科技中国,2018(7):28-36.
[17] 张先冶,甄红线.政府管制、终极所有权与企业价值[J].天津商业大学学报,2010,30(3):8-12.
[18] 骆严,焦洪涛.政府资助科技项目成果转化中国有资产管理制度的障碍及对策[J].中国科技论坛,2015(5):23-29.
[19] 谢地.试析高校国有科技成果转化的产权配置问题[J].电子知识产权,2018(9):51-66.
[20] 吴寿仁.科技成果转化若干热点问题解析(二十五)——新修订的〈事业单位国有资产管理暂行办法〉导读[J].科技中国,2019(6):52-57.
[21] 王澜明.改革开放以来我国事业单位改革的历史回顾[J].中国行政管理,2010(6):7-12.
[22] 岳云龙,陈立赓.事业单位法人治理结构问答(1)[J].中国机构改革与管理,2012(9):41-42.
[23] 岳云龙,陈立赓.事业单位法人治理结构问答(6)[J].中国机构改革与管理,2013(4):41-42.