美国研究型大学高水平教师成长环境分析及启示

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5587 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract Among global academic community, American research institutes and faculties have excellent influences.The way to study the development path of American high-level faculties, and its following suggestions and measures greatly advance the development of China's high-level faculties and competitiveness of universities under the circumstance of China's current“double first-class”construction.By case comparison and knowledge triangle theory, this paper explores typical types and main characteristics of innovative faculties development environment, and makes an in-depth analysis from the perspective of research-oriented university development history, school soft environment and academic community, and proposes corresponding countermeasures.

Key words： USA Research university High-level teacher Development environment

Received: 04 December 2019

PACS:

G647

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Wu Li

Cite this article:

Wu Li. The Development Environment of High-Level Teachers in American Research Universities and Its Enlightenment[J]. , 2020, 1(5): 182-188.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I5/182

[1]LOMBARDI John, ABBEY Craig,CRAIG Diane.The top American research universities:2017 annual report[M].Florida:UMass Amherst and University of Florida,2018.
[2]American Council on Education.Mapping internationalization on U.S.campuses-2017 edition[R/OL].American:ACE, 2017.https://www.acenet.edu/Research-Insights/Pages/Internationalization/Mapping-Internationalization-on-U-S-Campuses.aspx.
[3]The U.S Department of Commerce.The innovative and entrepreneurial university:higher education, innovation and entrepreneurship in focus[R/OL].American:2014.Http:// www.Commer-ce.gov/.
[4]AUTM.AUTM 2017 licensing activity survey[R/OL].American:AUTM,2018.https://autm.net/AUTM/media/SurveyReportsPDF/AUTM_2017_US_Licensing_Survey_no_appendix.pdf.
[5]刘军伟.美国世界一流大学的发展历程及经验启示[J].中国高教研究,2019(10):47-52.
[6]刘之远,张青根.治理视角下美国研究型大学教师发展组织结构变革研究[J].复旦教育论坛,2019,17(2):40-46+84.
[7]张晓报.美国研究型大学跨学科专业教育的实践及启示[J].高校教育管理,2019,13(5):92-103.
[8]吴雪萍,袁李兰.美国研究型大学研究生创新人才培养的基础、经验及其启示[J].高等教育研究,2019,40(6):102-109.
[9]沈红.大学教师评价的学科差异:对美国一所公立研究型大学的质性研究[J].复旦教育论坛,201715(3):72-79.
[10]耿益群.美国研究型大学跨学科研究教师绩效评价的原则、途径与特点[J].现代教育管理,2017(4):41-45.
[11]郄海霞.美国学术协会的功能及其对研究型大学的作用[J].清华大学教育研究,2012,33(1):51-58.
[12]李雪飞,程永波.美国研究型大学教师创新创业精神的培养——基于美国商务部《创新与创业型大学》的报告分析[J].江苏高教,2019(3):119-124.
[13]项杨雪,梅亮,陈劲.基于高校知识三角的产学研协同创新实证研究——自组织视角[J].管理工程学报,2014,28(3):100-109+99.
[14]王凤玉,寇文淑.研究型大学科技创新能力提升的政策变量——以美国科技政策为中心的考察[J].湖南师范大学教育科学学报,2019(18)2:81-87.
[15]何丽.美国高校教师科研产出差异与评估困境研究[J].中国高等教育评估,2017(2):61-67.