|
|
From Reward Orientation to Entitlement Orientation:The reform of Ownership of Service Invention in new China in the past 70 years |
Zhang Huibin1, Wu Yunshi2 |
1.School of Civil and Commercial Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China; 2.School of Administrative Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China |
|
|
Abstract This paper focuses on the reform of the ownership of service invention and outlines the development course of the service invention system in the 70 years of new China through a reward-oriented and rights-oriented narrative.The main conclusions are as follows:in the 30 years before the reform and opening up,service inventors had enjoyed autonomy of will,and could decide the ownership of service invention patents and obtain corresponding awards.The subsequent changes in current events resulted in the useless patent system and the disappearance of the award for service invention.Thanks to the reform and opening-up policy,great progress has been made in the reform of China's scientific and technological system.The system of service invention has been restored step by step.The reform of science and technology system,the improvement of patent system,the promotion of patent policy and the incentive of innovation are the driving forces for the reform of service invention right in new China.At present,Regulations On Service Inventions (Draft)still has some disadvantages,such as the lack of strong protection of the rights and interests of service inventors as well as the underresponsibility of the unit.
|
Received: 07 December 2019
|
|
|
|
|
[1]武衡,杨浚.当代中国的科学技术事业[M].北京:当代中国出版社,1991:8-9. [2]杨一凡,陈寒枫.中华人民共和国法制史[M].哈尔滨:黑龙江人民出版社,1996:536. [3]王家福,夏叔华.中国专利法[M].北京:北京群众出版社,1987:66-67. [4]肖冰.职务发明奖酬制度公平的价值取向及立法完善[J].湖南工业大学学报:社会科学版,2012(3):51-56. [5]萧国亮,隋福民.中华人民共和国经济史[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2011:104. [6]孙烈.中国科技体制的演变[J].中国科学院院刊,2019(9):970-981. [7]王小鲁.改革40年与中国经济的未来[J].新金融,2018(7):25-30. [8]中国第一件专利申请人:保护专利是认可知识的价值[EB/OL].(2018-12-06)[2019-04-08].http://v.cyol.com/content/2018-12/06/content_17843481.htm. [9]郑友德,高华.论专利制度对创新的激励[J].科研管理,1999(3):69-74. [10]刘向妹,刘群英.职务发明报酬制度的国际比较及建议[J].知识产权,2006(2):84-88. [11]罗东川.职务发明权属与奖酬纠纷典型案例精选与注解[M].北京:法律出版社,2015:254. [12]张宗任.职务发明的权利归属和报酬问题研究[J].知识产权,2014(10):72-77. [13]职务发明人权益保护状况调研报告[EB/OL].(2014-03-31)[2019-4-10].http://www.cnipa.gov.cn. [14]张维.企业老总平均每天出两项发明被指荒唐至极,职务发明亟待单独立法规范署名权[N].法制日报,2016-04-05(6). [15]国家知识产权局统计年报[EB/OL].(2018-09-30)[2019-4-10].http://www.cnipa.gov.cn. [16]唐志红,陈光,周贤永,等.创造力资本视角下的高校职务发明专利权效率理论构建[J].软科学,2019(5):35-40. [17]职务发明人权益保护状况调研报告[EB/OL].(2014-03-31)[2019-4-10].http://www.cnipa.gov.cn. [18]刘强,姚梦媛.职务发明报酬数额影响因素研究[J].南京理工大学学报:社会科学版,2017(6):52-61. [19]蒋舸.职务发明奖酬管制的理论困境与现实出路[J].中国法学,2016(3):125-144. [20]马名杰,张鑫.中国科技体制改革:历程、经验与展望[J].中国科技论坛,2019(6):1-8. |
|
|
|