创新网络中组织异质性、互动强度与合作创新绩效的关系

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (15)

Download: PDF (5245 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract This study explores the moderating effect of interaction intensity on the relationship between organizational heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance from the perspective of different dimensions of organizational heterogeneity.Based on the survey data of 278 companies involved in cooperative innovation,we used multiple regression analysis method to test the relationship between variables.The results show that target heterogeneity and cultural heterogeneity have negative effect on cooperative innovation performance,and the effect of management autonomy heterogeneity on cooperative innovation performance is not significant.In addition,the frequency of interaction has a moderating effect on the relationship between target heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance,the quality of interaction has a moderating effect on the relationship between target heterogeneity and cooperative innovation performance.Based on the results of empirical research,the implications of management and practice are presented.

Key words： Innovation networks Organizational heterogeneity Interaction intensity Innovation performance

Received: 06 May 2019

PACS:

F124.3

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Chen Guanju
	Zhang Hui

Cite this article:

Chen Guanju,Zhang Hui. Relationship Among Organizational Heterogeneity, Interaction Intensity and Cooperative Innovation Performance[J]. , 2020, 1(2): 28-35.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2020/V1/I2/28

[1]HILLMAN A,WITHERS M C,COLLINS B J.Resource dependence theory:a review[J].Journal of management,2009,35 (6):1404-1427.
[2]ADNER R,KAPOOR R.Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution:re-examining technology s-curves[J].Strategic management journal,2016,37 (4):625-648.
[3]AFUAH A.How much do your co-opetitors′ capabilities matter in the face of technological change[J].Strategic management journal,2000,21 (3):387-404.
[4]GOERZEN A,BEAMISH P W.The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance[J].Strategic management journal,2005,26 (4):333-354.
[5]刘克寅,汤临佳.基于异质性要素匹配的企业合作创新作用机理研究[J].科技管理研究,2016,36 (7):11-18.
[6]HUANG S,CHEN J,LIANG L.How open innovation performance respond to partner heterogeneity in China[J].Management decision,2018,56 (1):26-46.
[7]HAMBRICK D C,FINKELSTEIN S.Managerial discretion:a bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes[J].Research in organizational behavior,1987,9 (4):369-406.
[8]陆立军,陆舞鹄.区域创新体系的交互强度及其边界[J].管理学报,2009,6 (11):1501.
[9]何郁冰,吴倩倩.KIBS企业与客户互动创新的影响因素及其作用机制研究[J].研究与发展管理,2015,27 (6):57-67.
[10]王瑛.企业知识转移、互动机制与联盟创新绩效的关系研究[J].学术论坛,2011 (1):138-143.
[11]NAMBISAN S,BARON R A.Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems:entrepreneurs′ self-regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success[J].Entrepreneurship theory & practice,2013,37 (5):1071-1097.
[12]张三保,张志学.管理自主权:融会中国与西方、连接宏观与微观[J].管理世界,2014 (3):102-118.
[13]PERKS H,JEFFERY R.Global network configuration for innovation:a study of international fibre innovation[J].R&D management,2006,36 (1):67-83.
[14]陈莹,武志伟.联盟企业间关系公平性对合作绩效的影响——关系承诺的中介作用与目标一致的调节作用[J].预测,2014,33 (6):15-19.
[15]王冬雪.产学研合作创新知识管理绩效评价研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工程大学,2011.
[16]DIONYSIOU D D,TSOUKAS H.Understanding the (re)creation of routines from within:a symbolic interactionist perspective[J].Academy of management review,2013,38 (2):181-205.
[17]戴勇,胡明溥.产学研伙伴异质性对知识共享的影响及机制研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2016,37 (6):66-79.
[18]蔺丰奇,刘益.影响中外企业间技术转移效果的因素及对策[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007,28 (3):31-35.
[19]SANTORO M D,GOPALAKRISHNAN S.The institutionalization of knowledge transfer activities within industry-university collaborative ventures[J].Journal of engineering & technology management,2000,17 (3-4):299-319.
[20]LIU T.Knowledge transfer:past research and future directions[J].The business review,2007,7 (1):273-281.
[21]CAMBRA-FIERRO J,FLORIN J,PEREZ L,et al.Inter-firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer,innovation and value creation in networks[J].Management decision,2011,49 (3):444-467.
[22]LIN C,LIN P,SONG F.Property rights protection and corporate R&D:evidence from China[J].Journal of development economics,2009,93 (1):49-62.
[23]张秀峰,陈光华,杨国梁,等.企业所有权性质影响产学研合作创新绩效了吗[J].科学学研究,2015,33 (6):934-942.
[24]龙勇,张留金.竞争性联盟中资源投入差异对合作效应的实证研究[J].软科学,2009,23 (7):6-11.
[25]苏文兵,李心合,徐东辉,等.经理自主权与R＆D投入的相关性检验——来自中国证券市场的经验证据[J].研究与发展管理,2010,22 (4):30-38.
[26]李成龙,刘智跃.产学研耦合互动对创新绩效影响的实证研究[J].科研管理,2013,34 (3):23-30.
[27]陈关聚,张慧.创新网络交互度对区域创新的影响及地区差异研究[J].工业技术经济,2018,37 (12):52-60.
[28]JIANG R J,TAO Q T,SANTORO M D.Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance[J].Strategic management journal,2010,31 (10):1136-1144.
[29]胡慧玲,杜栋.产学研协同创新互动过程的博弈论分析[J].科技管理研究,2015,35 (3):19-21.
[30]李志远,王雪方.组织学习与客户知识管理能力的关系研究——关系嵌入的调节[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2015,36 (3):152-162.
[31]刘国巍.社会资本对产学研合作创新绩效的影响机理——基于指定搜索方法和结构方程的实证[J].技术经济与管理研究,2015 (7):28-33.
[32]王雪原,王宏起.区域创新平台资源交互路径与规则设计[J].科技进步与对策,2012,29 (4):27-30.
[33]王兆云.组织间目标差异、信息分享行为对应急合作关系的作用[D].武汉:武汉纺织大学,2015.
[34]赵岑,姜彦福.中国企业战略联盟伙伴特征匹配标准实证研究[J].科学学研究,2010,28 (4):558-565.
[35]GERHART B,MILKOVICH G T.Organizational differences in managerial compensation and financial performance[J].Academy of management journal,1990,33 (4):663-691.
[36]张三保,张志学.区域制度差异,CEO管理自主权与企业风险承担——中国30省高技术产业的证据[J].管理世界,2012 (4):101-114.
[37]张长征,李怀祖,赵西萍.企业规模、经理自主权与R&D投入关系研究——来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].科学学研究,2006 (3):432-438.
[38]王立生.社会资本、吸收能力对知识获取和创新绩效的影响研究[D].杭州:浙江大学,2007.
[39]PAVLOU P A,SAWY O A E.Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities[J].Decision sciences,2011,42 (1):239-273.
[40]岳鹄,张宗益,朱怀念.创新主体差异性、双元组织学习与开放式创新绩效[J].管理学报,2018,15 (1):48-56.
[41]宋晶,陈菊红,孙永磊.核心企业领导风格、组织间信任与合作创新绩效的关系研究[J].中国科技论坛,2013 (11):73-78.