|
|
|
| The Influence of National Science and Technology Reform Policy Orientation on Subject Evaluation Indicator System |
| Zhang Yaofang,Han Haibo |
| Institute of Science and Technology Development,ShanghaiJiao Tong University,Shanghai 200240,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract Under the background of the national science and technology system reform,this paper studies the policy basis and guidance changes of the subject evaluation indicator system design,analyzes the influence of the current science and technology reform policy on the design of the new round of evaluation indicator system,and further extends the future subject evaluation.The research shows that the design of the subject evaluation index system is closely related to and inseparable from the policy changes of the national education development and science and technology reform.In the future,the actual contribution and growth of talents will be valued more,and the alienation of the title of“hat”will be further eliminated.More emphasis will be placed on the quality of students' training and comprehensive quality,and talent training will further become a key core indicator;It will give more prominence to the country's major needs and further promote original and independent innovation in key core areas;It will focus more on the needs of economic and social development and further strengthen the construction of the integrity system;Cultural inheritance and innovation and international cooperation and exchange indicators will increase,and further attention will be paid to the soft power of discipline construction.At the same time,the assessment cycle may need to be relatively fixed or extended;The application of assessment findings may need to be further strengthened;The relationship between quantitative assessment and qualitative assessment may need to be further optimized.
|
|
Received: 25 January 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]赵立莹.问责与改进:我国第四轮学科评估元评估[J].学位与研究生教育,2018(2):32-38.
[2]方跃平,邹放鸣.我国学科类型化评估机制的完善[J].江苏高教,2018(7):21-25.
[3]林梦泉,姜辉,任超.学科评估发展与改革探究[J].中国高等教育,2010(21):43-52.
[4]蒋林浩,沈文钦,陈洪捷,等.学科评估的方法、指标体系及其政策影响:美英中三国的比较研究[J].高等教育研究,2014,35(11):92-101.
[5]李锋亮,黄倩殷.英国科研评估制度变化动向及其启示[J].学位与研究生教育,2015(1):74-77.
[6]万坤,李晨英,韩明杰,等.瑞典FOKUS科研质量评价框架特征分析及启示[J].科技管理研究,2016(19):70-80.
[7]梅红,宋晓平.“双一流”建设中的学科评估创新探索[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(5):22-28.
[8]丁雪梅.关于高等学校重点学科评估指标体系及评分标准的建议[J].学位与研究生教育,2001(2):26-29.
[9]方跃平,汪全胜.论我国学术声誉评估及其优化[J].学位与研究生教育,2017(11):18-22.
[10]国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要工作小组办公室.国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010—2020年)[EB／OL].(2010-07-29)[2018-12-09].http://www.moe.edu.cn/srcsite/A01/s7048/201007/t20100729_171904.html.
[11]国务院.国务院关于印发统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设总体方案的通知[EB／OL].(2015-11-05)[2018-12-09].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2015-11/05/content_10269.htm.
[12]中共中央,国务院.中共中央、国务院关于深化科技体制改革加快国家创新体系建设的意见[EB／OL].(2012-09-23)[2018-12-09].http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2012/content_2238927.htm.
[13]教育部.教育部关于深化高等学校科技评价改革的意见[EB／OL].(2013-12-20)[2018-12-09].http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2013-12/20/content_2551954.htm.
[14]教育部.教育部关于发布高等学校科技分类评价指标体系及评价要点的函[EB／OL].(2014-07-25)[2018-12-09].http://www.moe.edu.cn/s78/A16/s8213/A16_sjhj/201507/t20150703_192413.html.
[15]教育部.教育部、财政部、国家发展改革委关于印发统筹推进世界一流大学和一流学科建设实施办法(暂行)的通知[EB／OL].(2017-01-24)[2018-12-09].https://baike.so.com/doc/24644150-25532719.html.
[16]中共中央办公厅,国务院办公厅.中共中央办公厅、国务院办公厅关于深化项目评审、人才评价、机构评估改革的意见[EB／OL].(2018-07-03)[2018-12-09].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-07/03/content_5303251.htm.
[17]国务院.国务院关于优化科研管理 提升科研绩效若干措施的通知[EB／OL].(2018-07-24)[2018-12-09].http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2018-07/24/content_5308787.htm.
[18]教育部.教育部、财政部、国家发展改革委印发关于高等学校加快“双一流”建设的指导意见[EB／OL].(2018-08-27)[2018-12-09].https://www.chsi.com.cn/jyzx/201808/20180827/1716444534.html.
[19]科技部.科技部、教育部、人力资源社会保障部、中科院、工程院关于开展清理“唯论文、唯职称、唯学历、唯奖项”专项行动的通知[EB／OL].(2018-10-24)[2018-12-09].https://www.eol.cn/shanxi/shanxinews/201810/t20181024_1630117.shtml. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 0 
