20年STEM发展趋势与知识图谱分析

Abstract
Figure/Table
References
Related Citation (3)

Download: PDF (6905 KB) HTML (1 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

Abstract STEM is acronym for Science,Technology,Engineering and Mathematics.STEM implements interdisciplinary teaching,innovation nurturing technological talent method,and becomes an important issue on science and technology education learning in advanced countries.This study explored the knowledge structure and development trends of STEM research topics with bibliometrics co-citation analysis.Retrieval from Web of Science (WoS)database,accessible the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI)and the Science Citation Index (SCI)journal articles from 1996 to 2016,the paper obtained 653 articles and 31174 citations.The results shows that:①There is a rapid increase on the number of studies literature published in recent years;②Research theme focuses on gender differences,race and curriculum standards,with “gender differences”as the core,and “teacher education”as the weakest;③There are ten main categories:there are four categories associated with psychology,secondly for education,engineering,multidisciplinary,social sciences,interdisciplinary;information science & library science;④The research topics and development trends of STEM are closely related to education,psychology,chemistry and other disciplines;⑤ “gender differences”and “teacher education”curriculum development in STEM,are worthy of further study.

Key words： STEM Research front Technological human development Complex talent

Received: 17 September 2018

PACS:

G359

	Service

	E-mail this article
	Add to my bookshelf
	Add to citation manager
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors
	Fang Yushen

Cite this article:

Fang Yushen. Developing Tendency of STEM Research Topics and Knowledge Mapping Analysis in 20 Years[J]. , 2019, 0(8): 161-169.

URL:

http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/ OR http://www.zgkjlt.org.cn/EN/Y2019/V0/I8/161

[1]KATZ H E,PAVESE K E.MRS applauds passage of America competes act of 2007[J].MRS bulletin,2007,32 (11):958-958.
[2]中国教育科学研究院.中国STEM教育白皮书[R].中国教育科学研究院,2017.
[3]SANDERS M.Integrative STEM education primer[J].The technology teacher,2009,68 (4):20-26.
[4]MORRISON J S.Ties STEM education monograph series,attributes of STEM education[M].Baltimore:TIES,2006.
[5]National Science Foundation.National Science Foundation (NSF)at a glance[EB/OL]. (2012-10-01)[2018-08-02].http://www.nsf.gov/about/glance.jsp.
[6]KRUG D H.STEM education and sustainability in Canada and the United States[C/OL]. (2012-10-01)[2018-02-02].2nd international STEM in education conference.http://stem2012.bnu.edu.cn/data/long%20paper/stem2012_87.pdf
[7]BYBEE R W.Advancing STEM education:A 2020 vision[J].Technology & engineering teacher,2010,70 (1):30-35.
[8]WHALEN D F,SHELLEY M C.Academic success for STEM and non-STEM majors[J].STEM education,2010,11 (1,2):45-60.
[9]区建峰.STEM理念融合与教育装备创新发展[J].中国现代教育装备,2014,18:1-8.
[10]CORLU M S.Insights into STEM education praxis:An assessment scheme for course syllabi[J].Kuram ve uygulamada egitim bilimleri,2013,13 (4):2477-2485.
[11]张丽娟.美国STEM 学科高等教育女生人数不足的相关研究[J].大学教育,2015(6):164-165.
[12]OH S S,KIM J.Science and engineering majors in the federal service:Lessons for eliminating sexual and racial inequality[J].Review of public personnel administration,2015,35 (1):24-46.
[13]罗晖,李朝晖.美国实施科学、技术、工程和数学教育战略提升国家竞争力[J].科普研究,2014,9 (5):32-40.
[14]BASHAM J D,ISRAEL M,MAYNARD K.An ecological model of STEM education:Operationalizing STEM for all[J].Journal of special education technology,2010,25 (3):1-2.
[15]GREENE J C,DESTEFANO L,BURGON H,et al.An educative,values-engaged approach to evaluating STEM educational programs[J].New directions for evaluation,2006,109:53-71.
[16]李雁冰. “科学、技术、工程与数学”教育运动的本质反思与实践问题——对话加拿大英属哥伦比亚大学Nashon教授[J].全球教育展望,2014,43 (11):3-8.
[17]BROWN J.The current status of STEM education research[J].STEM education,2012,13 (5):7-11.
[18]FANG Y S,LEE L S.Trends in technology education research topics:A co-citation analysis of the literature in 2004-2013[J].Canadian international journal of social science and education,2015,1:221-234.
[19]CHENA K,GUANB J.A bibliometric investigation of research performance in emerging nanobiopharmaceuticals[J].Journal of informetrics,2011,5 (2011):233-247.
[20]PRICE D J.Networks of scientific papers[J].Science,1965,149 (3683):510-515.
[21]刘则渊,陈悦,侯海燕.科学知识图谱:方法与应用[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.
[22]EVERTON S F.Disrupting dark networks[M].Cambridge;New York:University Press,2013.
[23]HAIR J F JR,BLACK W C,BABIN B J,et al.Multivariate data analysis[M].7th ed.New Jersey:Prentice Hall,2009.
[24]HYDE J S,LINN M C.Gender similarities in mathematics and science[J].Science,2006,314 (5799):599-600.
[25]SPELKE E S.Sex differences in intrinsic aptitude for mathematics and science？A critical review[J].American psychologist,2005,60 (9):950-958.
[26]HALPERN D F,BENBOW C P,GEARY D C,et al.The science of sex differences in science and mathematics[J].Psychological science in the public interest,2007,8 (1):1-51.
[27]LUBINSKI D,BENBOW C P.Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years:Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise[J].Perspectives on psychological science,2006,1 (4):316-345.
[28]BANDURA A.Social foundations of thought and action:A social cognitive theory[M].Englewood Cliffs:Prentice Hall,1986.
[29]BANDURA A.Self-efficacy:Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change[J].Psychological review,1977,84 (2):191-215.
[30]ECCLES J.Who am I and what am I going to do with my life？Personal and collective identities as motivators of action[J].Educational psychologist,2009,44 (2):78-89.
[31]STEELE C M,ARONSON J.Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans[J].Journal of personality and social psychology,1995,69 (5):797-811.
[32]SEYMOUR E,HUNTER A B,LAURSEN S L,et al.Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences:First findings from a three-year study[J].Science education,2004,88 (4):493-654.
[33]MILES M B,HUBERMAN A M.Qualitative data analysis:An expanded sourcebook[M].2nd ed.Thousand Oaks:Sage Publications,1994.
[34]National Research Council.National science education standards[M].Washington:National Academy Press,1996.
[35]BUCK G A,CLARK V L P,LESLIE-PELECKY D,et al.Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models:A feminist approach[J].Science education,2007,92 (4):688-707.
[36]TYSON W,LEE R,BORMAN K M,et al.Science,technology,engineering,and mathematics (STEM)pathways:High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment[J].Journal of education for students placed at risk,2007,12 (3):243-270.
[37]National Research Council.Successful K-12 STEM education[M].Washington:The National Academies Press,2011.
[38]SPRINGER L,STANNE M E,DONOVAN S S.Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science,mathematics,engineering,and technology:A meta-analysis[J].Review of educational research,1999,69 (1):21-51.
[39]ASSEFA S G,RORISSA A.A bibliometric mapping of the structure of STEM education using co-word analysis[J].Journal of the American society for information science and technology,2013,64 (12):2513-2536.