|
|
|
| Dynamic Evolution and Driving Factors of Industrial Spatial Structure Under Environmental Regulation in China |
| Xu Chenglong1, Zhuang Guiyang2 |
1.Business College, Linyi University, Linyi 276005, China;
2.Institute for Urban and Environmental Studies,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100028,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract The paper examines the effects of environmental regulation on industrial spatial structure by adopting GMM dynamic panel model.The research is based on the temporal and spatial evolution characteristics of environmental regulation and industrial spatial structure from 2006 to 2015 in China.Through the analysis, the results show as follows:①The spatial disparity of environmental regulation can be found in year 2006—2015,reflecting in more intensive regulation in east China than that in the west. Especially,highly environmental-regulated area experienced an even intensified environmental regulation since 2012.While,the intensity of environmental regulation of its counterparty,namely the lowly environmental-regulated area, went up and down.②The industrial spatial structure from 2006 to 2015 demonstrated an east-to-middle and west movement trend generally.The industrial spatial structure was diffusive in highly environmental-regulated area,that of concentrate in lowly regulated area.③The Regional Effects can be detected in national industrial spatial structure in the impact of environmental regulation.More specifically, environmental regulation was under inverted U-shaped relationship with industrial spatial structure in China.Industrial spatial structure was negatively correlated with environmental regulation in highly environmental-regulated area.While it illustrated positive correlation in lowly environmental-regulated area.Economic development level and foreign trade policies had a positive effect on the proportion of industrial added value.The labour costs had a negative effect on the proportion of industrial added value.Uncertainty was found in the impact of urbanization on the regional industrial spatial structure.
|
|
Received: 16 May 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]马丽,金凤君,刘毅.中国经济与环境污染耦合度格局及工业结构解析[J].地理学报,2012,67(10):1299-1307.
[2]张可,豆建民.工业集聚有利于减排吗[J].华中科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016,30(4):99-109.
[3]徐成龙,程钰.新常态下山东省环境规制对工业结构调整及其大气环境效应研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(10):1662-1674.
[4]DASGUPTA S,MODY A,ROY S,et al.Environmental regulation and development:a cross-country empirical analysis[J].Oxford development studies,2001,29(2):173-87.
[5]张崇辉,苏为华,曾守桢.基于CHME理论的环境规制水平测度研究[J].中国人口.资源与环境,2013,23(1):19-24.
[6]李钢,李颖.环境规制强度测度理论与实证进展[J].经济管理,2012,34(12):154-165.
[7]孙文远,杨琴.环境规制强度的测量:方法与前沿进展[J].生态经济,2017,33(12):132-138.
[8]郭庆宾,刘琪,张冰倩.不同类型环境规制对国际R&D溢出效应的影响比较研究——以长江经济带为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2017,26(11):1752-1760.
[9]FUJITA M,THISSE J F.Does geographical agglomeration foster economic growth?And who gains and losses from it[J].Japanese economic review,2003,54(2):121-145.
[10]KIYOHIRO Ikeda,KAZUO Murota,TAKASHI Akamatsu,et al.Agglomeration patterns in a long narrow economy of a new economic geography model:analogy to a racetrack economy[J].International journal of economic theory,2017,13(1):113-145.
[11]夏丽丽,闫小培.基于重化工业发展的珠江三角洲工业空间结构演变研究[J].人文地理,2009,24(6):68-72.
[12]罗胤晨,谷人旭,王春萌,等.县域工业集聚的空间效应分析及其影响因素——基于长江三角洲地区的实证研究[J].经济地理,2015,35(12):120-128.
[13]文玫.中国工业在区域上的重新定位和聚集[J].经济研究,2004(2):84-94.
[14]徐敏燕,左和平.集聚效应下环境规制与产业竞争力关系研究——基于“波特假说”的再检验[J].中国工业经济,2013(3):72-84.
[15]彭文斌,吴伟平,邝嫦娥.环境规制对污染产业空间演变的影响研究——基于空间面板杜宾模型[J].世界经济文汇,2014(6):99-110.
[16]范玉波,刘小鸽.基于空间替代的环境规制产业结构效应研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2017,27(10):30-38.
[17]覃伟芳,廖瑞斌.环境规制、产业效率与产业集聚[J].现代财经,2015,35(3):14-26.
[18]郝寿义,张永恒.环境规制对经济集聚的影响研究——基于新经济地理学视角[J].软科学,2016,30(4):27-30.
[19]张平,张鹏鹏.环境规制对产业区际转移的影响——基于污染密集型产业的研究[J].财经论丛,2016(5):96-104.
[20]王勇,李建民.环境规制强度衡量的主要方法、潜在问题及其修正[J].财经论丛,2015(5):98-106.
[21]李伟,贺灿飞.劳动力成本上升与中国制造业空间转移[J].地理科学,2017,37(9):1289-1299.
[22]谢里,张敬斌.中国制造业集聚的空间技术溢出效应:引入制度环境差异的研究[J].地理研究,2016,35(5):909-928.
[23]王玉海,刘学敏.区域经济集聚的资源视角分析[J].经济地理,2009,29(4):560-566.
[24]贺灿飞,潘峰华,孙蕾.中国制造业的地理集聚与形成机制[J].地理学报,2007(12):1253-1264. |
|
|
|
2019, Vol. 0 
