|
|
|
| Have the Innovation Incentive Policies Promoted the Innovation Efficiency of High-tech Zones |
| Fan Shuo1,He Bin2 |
1.School of Economics,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China;
2.Center for Public Sector Economy Research,Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China |
|
|
|
|
Abstract This paper uses provincial panel data of 89 state-level high-tech zones in 2011—2015,calculates the innovation efficiency of the national high-tech zones by the Bootstrap DEA-Meatafrontier method.Then the innovation efficiency index is tested by the global spatial correlation and the local spatial correlation test.Finally,the Tobit model is used to test whether the national innovation incentive policies could improve the innovation efficiency of high-tech zones.The results show that:First,China's financial subsidies play a negative role in the innovation efficiency of high-tech zones.The reason may be that the financial support system is not smooth,leading to financial subsidies mostly into the“system trap”.Besides the high proportion of free subsidy and the lack of supervision afterwards are also important reasons.Second,tax incentives for R&D activities play a negative incentive role in the innovation efficiency of high-tech zones,showing that the lack of different design in tax incentives of science and technology enterprises in China changes the composition of capital investment in innovation activities because of the driving of short-term interests,and then distorts the effective allocation of scientific and technological resources.Third,the direct tax relief of high-tech enterprises is not related to the innovation efficiency of high-tech zones.It is due to the existence of certain irrationality in the identification of high-tech enterprises,but also due to the lack of evaluation and tracking mechanism,resulting in a large number of enterprises fraud and serious moral hazard.China should improve its support mode and gradually improve its support mechanism.
|
|
Received: 25 August 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1]CHRISTENSEN Claytonm.The innovator's dilemma:When new technologies cause great firms to fail [M].Boston，Mass.:Harvard Business School Press,1997.
[2]陈劲，戴凌燕，李良德.突破性创新及其识别[J].科技管理研究,2002（5):22-28.
[3]孙启贵，邓欣，徐飞.破坏性创新的概念界定与模型构建[J].科技管理研究,2006,26(8):175-178.
[4]CHRISTENSEN C M,RAYNOR E M.The innovator's solution:creating and sustaining successful growth[M].Harvard Business School Press,2003.
[5]KENAGY J W,CHRISTENSEN C M.Disruptive innovation:a new diagnosis for health care′s"financial flu"[J].Healthcare financial management:journal of the healthcare financial management association,2002,56(5):62-66.
[6]〖JP2〗KENAGY J W.A brief commentary on disruptive innovation in health care[EB/OL].(2001-07-20).http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/072301Kenagy.pdf.
[7]THOMOND P,LETTICE F.Disruptive innovation explored[M].Cranfield,England,2002.
[8]郭政.后发企业破坏性创新的机理与路径研究[D].上海：上海交通大学，2007.
[9]宋建元.成熟型大企业开展破坏性创新的机理与途径研究[D].杭州：浙江大学，2005.
[10]杨强.基于破坏性创新的企业多元化战略模式研究[D].天津：天津大学，2008.
[11]许泽浩，张光宇.新技术如何跨越“死亡之谷”——基于SNM视角的颠覆性技术保护空间构建[J].中国高校科技，2017（6):20-23.
[12]陈继祥，戴芳，王家宝.颠覆性创新与企业竞争优势研究[M].上海：上海交通大学出版社，2012：60.
[13]毛荐其.技术创新——进化原理、过程与模型[M].北京：经济管理出版社，2006.
[14]高常青.TRIZ——发明问题解决理论[M].北京：科学出版社，2011.
[15]FEY V,RIVIN E .Innovation on demand[M].NewYork:Cambridge University Press,2005.
[16]RANTANEN K，DOMB E.Simplified TRIZ[M].CRC Press.2002.
[17]白冰.电动汽车技术创新模式研究[D].长沙：中南大学,2011,12:39-40. |
|
|
|
2018, Vol. 0 
