Assessment of the Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation in Chinese Universities
Zhong Wei1, Chen Baoming2
1.School of Public Administration and Policy,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China; 2.Chinese Academy of Science and Technology for Development,Beijing 100038,China
Abstract The assessment of the efficiency of scientific and technological achievements transformation in universities is of great significance to understand the current situation of scientific and technological achievements transformation and strengthen macroeconomic regulation and management.However,there are still disagreements over the understanding of the basic concepts of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements,the mode of transformation,and the standard of successful transformation.On the basis of above three issues,as well as the comparison of the concept of scientific and technological achievements transformation with the concept of technology transfer,this paper extracts the essences of inputs and outputs in the course of transforming scientific and technological achievements in universities.Thereinto,inputs are the several of application-oriented scientific and technological achievements,including patents;and outputs are the three modes of transformation,including technology transfer,license and evaluation investment.With these inputs and outputs,and using Bootstrap-DEA,this paper estimates the efficiency of scientific and technological achievements transformation of 50 Chinese universities from 2010 to 2012.It is found that the integral level of the scientific and technological achievements transformation in Chinese universities is not high(the mean value is 0.387).In the process of scientific and technological achievements transformation,there are better performance in the universities which have the strength of scientific research,medical college,and are the first to join the National University Science Park.
Zhong Wei,Chen Baoming. Assessment of the Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation in Chinese Universities[J]. , 2018, 0(4): 41-49.
[1]陈宝明.加快科技成果转化的若干措施与政策建议[J].中国高校科技与产业化,2010(6):23-25. [2]刘永千.科技成果转化能力评价研究:以上海市为例[J].中国科技论坛,2017(1):12-18. [3]孙德升,刘峰,陈志.高校科技成果转化的 ISCP 范式分析[J].中国科技论坛,2017(3):142-148. [4]KOCHENKOVA A,GRIMALDI R,MUNARI F.Public policy measures in support of knowledge transfer activities:a review of academic literature[J].The journal of technology transfer,2016,41(3):407-429. [5]CHEN A,PATTON D,KENNEY M.University technology transfer in China:a literature review and taxonomy[J].The journal of technology transfer,2016,41(5):891-929. [6]赵志耘,杜红亮.我国科技成果转化过程监测指标体系探讨[J].中国软科学,2011(11):8-14. [7]蔡跃洲.科技成果转化的内涵边界与统计测度[J].科学学研究,2015(1):37-44. [8]何彬,范硕.中国大学科技成果转化效率演变与影响因素——基于 Bootstrap-DEA 方法和面板 Tobit 模型的分析[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(10):85-94. [9]贺德方.对科技成果及科技成果转化若干基本概念的辨析与思考[J].中国软科学,2011(11):1-7. [10]赵捷,张杰军,汤世国,等.科技成果转化中的技术入股问题研究[J].科学学研究,2011,29(10):1485-1489. [11]钟卫,左毅.产学研合作效果测量:理论与实践[J].中国科技论坛,2015(8):51-57. [12]李修全.应用类科技成果转化的概念及测度方法——“科技成果转化指数” 构建探讨[J].科技管理研究,2015,35(23):46-49. [13]许端阳.国外技术转移监测评价的特点及其对我国科技成果转化评价的启示[J].科技管理研究,2013,33(21):23-28. [14]FORAY D,LISSONI F.University research and public-private interaction[J].Handbook of the economics of innovation,2010(1):275-314. [15]SAVVA N,TANERI N.The role of equity,royalty,and fixed fees in technology licensing to university spin-offs[J].Management science,2015,61(6):1323-1343. [16]FELDMAN M,FELLER I,BERCOVITZ J,et al.Equity and the technology transfer strategies of American research universities[J].Management science,2002,48(1):105-121. [17]孙远钊.论科技成果转化与产学研合作——美国《 拜杜法》 35 周年的回顾与展望[J].科技与法律,2015(5):1008-1037. [18]BOZEMAN B.Technology transfer and public policy:a review of research and theory[J].Research policy,2000,29(4):627-655. [19]COELLI T J,RAO D S P,O'DONNELL C J,et al.An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis[M].Springer Science & Business Media,2005. [20]ANDERSON T R,DAIM T U,LAVOIE F F.Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer[J].Technovation,2007,27(5):306-318. [21]SIEGEL D S,WALDMAN D,LINK A.Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices:an exploratory study[J].Research policy,2003,32(1):27-48. [22]李小丽,余翔.区域三螺旋强度及 TTO 特征对 TTO 效率的影响研究[J].科研管理,2014(9):115-122. [23]SIMAR L,WILSON P W.A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models[J].Journal of applied statistics,2000,27(6):779-802. [24]HO M H C,LIU J S,LU W M,et al.A new perspective to explore the technology transfer efficiencies in US universities[J].The journal of technology transfer,2014,39(2):247-275. [25]DI GREGORIO D,SHANE S.Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others?[J].Research policy,2003,32(2):209-227. [26]BATHELT H,KOGLER D F,MUNRO A K.A knowledge-based typology of university spin-offs in the context of regional economic development[J].Technovation,2010,30(9):519-532. [27]KIM Y.The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage:productivity changes in university technology transfer[J].The journal of technology transfer,2013,38(2):180-197. [28]钟卫.合著数据表征的中国研究型大学产学研合作绩效评估[J].科技进步与对策,2016,33(14):118-123. [29]CURI C,DARAIO C,LLERENA P.University technology transfer:how(in)efficient are French universities[J].Cambridge journal of economics,2012,36(3):629-654. [30]CALDERA A,DEBANDE O.Performance of Spanish universities in technology transfer:an empirical analysis[J].Research policy,2010,39(9):1160-1173. [31]COHEN W M,NELSON R R,WALSH J P.Links and impacts:the influence of public research on industrial R&D[J].Management science,2002,48(1):1-23. [32]D'ESTE P,PATEL P.University-industry linkages in the UK:What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry[J].Research policy,2007,36(9):1295-1313. [33]李修全,玄兆辉,杨洋.从中美高校知识流动对比看我国高校科技成果转化特点[J].中国科技论坛,2014(12):98-102.
2018, Vol. 0 
